Prototype — static build (Lane C). Content mirrored from the Zoho CMS staging site.
Home › AI Regulation › Jurisdictions › South America
Proposed

South America

At a glance

Regulator / body
Brazil: the Chamber of Deputies special committee examining bill PL 2338/2023. Chile: the Senate, which is examining Boletín 16.821-19. Other South American countries were not researched.
Status
No comprehensive AI statute is in force in the countries covered. Brazil's and Chile's AI bills are proposed and have stalled or progressed slowly.
Effective dates
Brazil: PL 2338/2023 passed the Senate on 2024-12-10; a Chamber vote is reported to slip beyond the October 2026 elections, after five missed vote dates since November 2025. Chile: the executive's framework proposal was presented to senators on 2026-05-26.
Last updated
Oct 10, 2026

Recent developments and what to watch

No change was found after 2026-10-07. The latest Brazilian dockets are dated 2026-09-01 and 2026-09-02 (from a secondary source citing the official docket).What to watch:the Brazilian Chamber voteafter the October elections, and Chile's Senate progress.

Key instruments

  • Brazil, PL 2338/2023(AI legal framework). Passed the Senate on 2024-12-10 and is now before a Chamber of Deputies special committee, with 37 related bills attached. The docket status is “awaiting rapporteur opinion”. Proposed.
  • Chile, Boletín 16.821-19(AI systems bill). In its first constitutional stage in the Senate. Proposed.

Scope: who and what is covered

Brazil's bill is a risk-based framework. The pattern across the region, in the research lane's interpretation, is that risk-based framework bills stall in legislatures. Mexico and Central America were also covered in the baseline research, but they are outside this entry; Mexico is described in the research notes as having no general AI law but some sectoral amendments.

Compliance and enforcement

No binding AI-specific obligations were confirmed. Organisations should watch Brazil after its October 2026 elections. Other South American countries were not researched.

Caveat.The source_url is the official Brazilian Chamber docket, but the run did not read that page; it relied on a secondary tracker, so the current status is unconfirmed against the official docket. Confidence is medium and the sources are mostly secondary. Research assistance, not legal advice.

References and further sources

Sources and further reading(prepared from the Spanglett Legal AI governance wiki and the October 2026 research run):

Primary source:https://www.camara.leg.br/proposicoesWeb/fichadetramitacao?idProposicao=2487262

This page is research assistance, not legal advice. Verify against the primary sources before relying on it.

On this page

Research assistance, not legal advice. Verify against primary sources before reliance.

Compare all jurisdictions →